Rather than take the boat on it's second trip this coming Monday, I've decided to go ahead and put the finishing touches on it, and be done with it.
So far, these "finishing touches" include painting the sides a nice green, doing the graphite bottom thing, including stealing Tradglen's bringing that black finish up the stem & stern to the rail, painting the inside bottom only a haze gray with some non-skid, and applying varnish to the sides on the inside, both inner and outer rails, and both decks, fore & aft.
The only "not quite sure" item is the addition of a keel, or keel runner as I call it.
After having the boat in the water, I can say that I don't need it to prevent any flexing or "oil-canning" of the bottom. Even standing up in the boat, the bottom has no tendency to flex. The bottom was made of 1/4" plywood and has a covering of 6 oz fiberglass cloth on the outside, filled with 3 layers of epoxy, and no cloth except for the taped seams on the inside, and a complete covering inside of 3 coats of the epoxy.
An additional factor that may be keeping the bottom from flexing is that in order to get a wider bottom, I used a total of 5 ribs, with the additional rib being right on top of the center butt joint.
So, why would I be thinking about adding that keel piece?
Well, from reading of the experiences of others. These "others" seem to belong to one of two groups, some with a foot in both camps. One group suggest that the addition of a keel helps with the boats tracking while paddling. Although a single trip is not enough to render judgment on this, I have to say that I found it very difficult to paddle the boat with a single-blade, canoe paddle. I could be that all I need is more practice, but I never had any problems paddling a canoe this way. I used what I guess you'd call something of a "J" stroke, I don't really know, never having had any instruction on the matter. I just paddled along, not having to switch from side to side to keep in a straight line.
In the Pirogue, it was different. I had a devil of a time going straight with that canoe paddle. But I also took my kayak paddle with me, the one I made by scarf-joining two canoe paddles together. Using that one, I had no problem tracking a straight line. So, I don't guess I really need a keel runner for that reason.
The other school of thought is based on the use of the Pirogue. It seems some have found that the keel helps when fishing, by providing some tracking stability while drifting. It would be a little annoying to have to continually altering the angle of the boat with a paddle, when you are fly fishing, especially when standing like I tend to do.
If I'm going to add this keel runner, it would be best to do so, before I apply the epoxy-graphite bottom. And I would like to do that on my next day off.
So, for anyone who'd installed a keel, or keel runner, just how much difference does it make? (I call it a keel runner because they don't stick down far enough in the water for me to think of it as a keel proper. But that doesn't matter.)
If you've put one on a Pirogue, did it really make a difference in the way the boat handled, under paddle-power or while drifting? I'm having a hard time with the concept that such a shallow addition, with most being only 1/2" to 3/4" by 2" or 3" wide, with the wide part being flat on the hull, of making that much of difference.
I'd really like to hear from those who've done this. Especially if you've tried the boat without it, then added it on.
Anyone?
Uncle John tells me it's not a bad idea, but also that he's not actually done it, himself. He suggested that I simply "tack" the keel piece on and try it. An excellent suggestion, but this time I'd rather take the short-cut of going by the experience of others, as I've gotten to the point of impatience and want to be done with it so I can get the boat out there and chase down some redfish! :lol:
Mike S.
Spring Hill, FL
So far, these "finishing touches" include painting the sides a nice green, doing the graphite bottom thing, including stealing Tradglen's bringing that black finish up the stem & stern to the rail, painting the inside bottom only a haze gray with some non-skid, and applying varnish to the sides on the inside, both inner and outer rails, and both decks, fore & aft.
The only "not quite sure" item is the addition of a keel, or keel runner as I call it.
After having the boat in the water, I can say that I don't need it to prevent any flexing or "oil-canning" of the bottom. Even standing up in the boat, the bottom has no tendency to flex. The bottom was made of 1/4" plywood and has a covering of 6 oz fiberglass cloth on the outside, filled with 3 layers of epoxy, and no cloth except for the taped seams on the inside, and a complete covering inside of 3 coats of the epoxy.
An additional factor that may be keeping the bottom from flexing is that in order to get a wider bottom, I used a total of 5 ribs, with the additional rib being right on top of the center butt joint.
So, why would I be thinking about adding that keel piece?
Well, from reading of the experiences of others. These "others" seem to belong to one of two groups, some with a foot in both camps. One group suggest that the addition of a keel helps with the boats tracking while paddling. Although a single trip is not enough to render judgment on this, I have to say that I found it very difficult to paddle the boat with a single-blade, canoe paddle. I could be that all I need is more practice, but I never had any problems paddling a canoe this way. I used what I guess you'd call something of a "J" stroke, I don't really know, never having had any instruction on the matter. I just paddled along, not having to switch from side to side to keep in a straight line.
In the Pirogue, it was different. I had a devil of a time going straight with that canoe paddle. But I also took my kayak paddle with me, the one I made by scarf-joining two canoe paddles together. Using that one, I had no problem tracking a straight line. So, I don't guess I really need a keel runner for that reason.
The other school of thought is based on the use of the Pirogue. It seems some have found that the keel helps when fishing, by providing some tracking stability while drifting. It would be a little annoying to have to continually altering the angle of the boat with a paddle, when you are fly fishing, especially when standing like I tend to do.
If I'm going to add this keel runner, it would be best to do so, before I apply the epoxy-graphite bottom. And I would like to do that on my next day off.
So, for anyone who'd installed a keel, or keel runner, just how much difference does it make? (I call it a keel runner because they don't stick down far enough in the water for me to think of it as a keel proper. But that doesn't matter.)
If you've put one on a Pirogue, did it really make a difference in the way the boat handled, under paddle-power or while drifting? I'm having a hard time with the concept that such a shallow addition, with most being only 1/2" to 3/4" by 2" or 3" wide, with the wide part being flat on the hull, of making that much of difference.
I'd really like to hear from those who've done this. Especially if you've tried the boat without it, then added it on.
Anyone?
Uncle John tells me it's not a bad idea, but also that he's not actually done it, himself. He suggested that I simply "tack" the keel piece on and try it. An excellent suggestion, but this time I'd rather take the short-cut of going by the experience of others, as I've gotten to the point of impatience and want to be done with it so I can get the boat out there and chase down some redfish! :lol:
Mike S.
Spring Hill, FL