More importantly that I was confusing SPEED with EFFICIENCY. I guess I'll never be fast but I'm more likely to be lazy I might as well be efficient!
G'day John,
What I was trying to say but was probably doing an appalling job of is this,
A very fast boat is not necessarily the best boat to cover a long distance in. Like wise a slow boat.
For me, the ideal is somewhere in between.ie,
I like a boat that is EFFICIENT through the water. By efficient, I mean a boat that will travel at close to it optimum hull speed with the least possible effort on my part to mke it do so. At the same time, part of that EFFICIENCY also involves how much work I have to do to balance the thing. An unstable boat can be very tiring just keeping the water underneath without even going anywhere.
If you compare a K1 or racing solo kayak with its very narrow beam and sleek hull lines
http://www.natureline.com.au/woodpecker.htm
to a TK1 or a Touring/racing kayak with its slightly wider, more stable hull,(but still very slippery through the water)
http://www.natureline.com.au/wanderer.htm
I would choose the TK1 every time as being, overall, a more suitable and enjoyable craft to paddle. While the TK1 requires a little more effort to go forward, It requires MUCH less effort to keep upright. Overall, I would call the TK1 as being a more effecient, and certainly, more enjoyable boat to paddle.
I have paddled both of these superbly fast kayaks and I own a TK1 like the one in the link. Neither boats have a round bottom and both boats are cosistent place getters in all our major down river marathons. For me, the TK1 is a much more enjoyable boat to paddle and is only marginally slower than the K1.